Here is another installment of "my thoughts". And today I am talking about Bret "The Hitman" Hart by a request. He is quoted by saying "I am the best there is, the best there was and the best there ever will be" but what does all that mean and does it really describe him?
First of all, I really wasn't watching wrestling in Bret Hart's era but I know quite a bit about him and what he did. Bret Heart wasn't in my era and he doesn't wrestle anymore. I know it's his life and he could do anything he wants but I would still like him to wrestle. Like I said, I would love him to come back, but if he EVER came back, I don't think it would be WWE. It would be WWE for many reasons and I will get to that later but I will say that I see a more likely chance that he would go to TNA. I am not saying he is going to TNA but if he ever came back, he would probably go there. Over the course of his career, he disliked WWE more and more.
Really the main reason is the Montreal Screw Job. This probably is the most controversial thing that happened in profession wrestling history. Really, I don't think we know the whole story of this Montreal job. I think there is something that we don't know. Bret Heart tells a different story and so does Vince McMahon. Really the question is what side you are going with? I would like to what I think about this.
I said earlier in this blog that its Bret Heart's life and he could do anything he wants to. With that being said, I don't blame him and I am not upset he left WWE. For the Montreal Screw job, the fact of that is Bret Hart was going to leave WWE and go to WCW. He was leaving already and WWE could do anything about it. But WWE had to protect their business and Vince had to get the title from him. If I was Vince, I would have done the same thing. Yes, I know that may be harsh but I would protect my business too. To tell you the truth, I don't see why Bret would be mad at Vince. I mean he had to protect his business and Bret shouldn't have the title if he is leaving. He got mad at McMahon because he lost unfairly against Shawn Michaels. On Bret's half, I wouldn't want to lose unfairly and have Vince do that to me, but you can't really say he lost unfairly.
The main point is Bret is "The best there is, the best there was, and the best there will ever be". I take that to some extent but I don't think he is THE BEST. He was the best of his time but not the best ever. He did have it all though. He had the wrestling ability, the charisma, the character, the strength, and the endurance. He was the perfect wrestler and I loved his work even though I haven't seen him wrestle much.
Like I said, I don't blame him for leaving WCW as it's his life and he saw what could have been a better business for him. I don't think he should be mad at WWE or Vince anymore. That was the past and I think if that never would have happened, you knows how big WWE would be now and how it would have changed WWE's foundation. Bottom line, Bret is a legend of the business and I only wish he comes back, I don't think he will, or wrestled just a bit longer. That is all for "my thoughts" for now but please check back to my others and wait to see my others coming soon. If you have any suggestions for a future "My thoughts" blog, then feel free to message me. Anyway that is my thoughts on this topic, but what are yours? Talk to you next time!
Visit my profile at http://fans.wwe.com/seinfeld1/?pref_tab=my_site


Its a pity you never got to see Bret wrestle, if u had then u would understand why he could say that he was the best there is the best there was and the best ther ever will be. Bret combined speed with technicle exelence and a great all round knowledge of ring techniche. To this day I still believe that Bret was an is the best. Unfortunately due to health reasons it is unliely that Bret will ever return to the squared circle or as u suggest the six sided circle of TNA.
hitman200004:22 AM EST