hey everyone, i didnt blog today at all so i decided to blog right now for a bit. many people here on fan nation are saying that TNA has a better roster than the WWE. well lets look into that, shall we! i do think that the knockouts and the TNA tag team division is better. they do have more tag teams that have a better chemistry. but many people are saying that TNA has better wrestlers than the WWE. TNA has kurt angle, who i think is the best in wrestling period, christian cage, Rhino, AJ styles, somoa joe, and booker T. they are the top people in TNA. but look what the WWE has to offer. WWE has the undertaker, who i the most well known star in wrestling, edge, triple h, john cena, and batista. i know many people dont think that cena is a good wrestler, but if hes a former wwe champion, then he means something. look at this, could u picture AJ styles beating edge. i am talking about the edge that mick foley was talking about on smackdown the other week. that would be a very great match, but edge would destory styles. or if u take undertaker vs. somoa joe. that would be one violent match, but the undertaker could kill joe. do u see what i am saying. really the WWE has better stars than TNA and i want people to see that. TNA is the company of the future though as they will be big "some" day! what do u think about the roster situation?
rosters are mistaken?
Thursday, August 14, 2008, 08:15 PM EST
[General]
Posted By: McMahon 101
Tags:
|
COOL |
That my be all very well and true I hate to admit, but look at this way half the top guys in the WWE are getting on a bit now. There have been rumours around that even though Undertaker is making a return at Summerslam that he will retire at WM XV and the same goes for HBK :(. At Wrestlemania XV, one of the biggest matches in history Taker vs HBK. Also even though you have toop quality matches on WWE how many times since Wrestlemania have we seen Taker vs Edge, it started out gd but man now its getting boring, no doubt looking forward to the HIAC but after its just going to continue again and get boring. There not giving enough of a push to the younger guys for the main events, thats were TNA is sucessful and in an interview Angle said thats one on the reasons he jump shipped because of the competition on TNA same with Christian, and now they got Booker T. Sting, Scott Steiner, Jeff Jarrett apart from all the TNA classics Styles, Abyss etc... At the moment "fact" TNA's ratings in the UK ahve gotten higher than WWE's on many occasions, its only a matter of time before we see a conflict between TNA & WWE. Thing is TNA is giving the younger guys more of a push to fill the boots the legends of the business when they're not around any more, and they are making sure that they doing that with all the roster not a select few, like the WWE e.g. what the hell happened to Burke on ECW, tramendous competitor but of course not enough push. I am a fan of both companies, but guys like Taker, HBK, HHH can't carry on for ever and yes they have amazing guys like Cena, Batista, Edge, Mysterio, Orton(out on injury), but they can't limit themselves to these guys. Have HHH vs Jeff Hardy for the WWE title, what kind of **** match is Khali vs HHH, I telling you ratings in that one match are going to sink fastest than the Titanic. D Lo Brown is back! Of course in less than 2 weeks of being bk they haven't even stuck him on the Summerslam card. Kofi Kingston vs D Lo Brown 4 ICTitle. I think I have made my point.
pharonic-man09:25 PM EST