Script: /thechosenone1967/blog/2008/10/27/credibility_of_the_world_title
SEARCH & WIN
SEARCH UNIVERSE
    ADVERTISEMENT

My Page

    Credibility Of The World Title

    Monday, October 27, 2008, 04:59 PM EST [General]

    Hey guys, i dont plan on talking much about Cyber Sunday as i would like to talk about The World Heavyweight Championship!

    Last night's show for me was average nothing spectacular but it was ok, i really enjoyed Undertaker and Big Show's contest, i thought it was very good and Taker sold like hell and it was good to see the choke back!

    Triple H and Jeff Hardy was good, not as good as No Mercy, however Jeff losing again and being pinned cleanely didn't do him any good and for me didnt do Triple H any good either, surely Triple H should have let Hardy at least get a DQ win or something over him or has Triple H's ego got the better of him again?.

    Now the main event, i thought the crowd in this match bombed, it seemed so quiet during the contest, maybe it was because everyone thought Jericho would retain (including me),Now for me Batista winning the title was the wrong move by WWE, i do not want to see Batista with the title at all at the moment, let him wait a little while longer.

    The reason i have for my opinion's here is that The World Championship is being treated so badly by management, yes it was the title that was on the shows WWE rivaled with in the past but surely they must start giving the belt credibility, for me that title has changed hands so many times in quick successions in the last year or so, CM Punk had the title for a month and half, Chris Jericho who is the baddest heel on the WWE roster at the moment is given 1 month as champion, c'mon thats a disgrace Jericho has worked his butt off all summer with HBK, and he is given a 1 month reign, that makes him look extremely weak.

    The last time for me The World Title looked creditible was when Triple H had it during his Evolution days and thats a long time.

    Ric Flair, Bret Hart, Hul Hogan, Sting and many many more legends have held that title with pride and i am just saddened that WWE just keep changing title holders in quick succession.

    As always guys i would really like your opinions on this, or is it just me who thinks this? or is their any folk out here who agree with me?- give me your opinions on WWE UNIVERSE or send me an email to Sevillecfc@aol.com

    UNTIL NEXT TIME

    The Chosen One

    0 (0 Ratings)
    Tags:
    [ 2 comments ] Leave a Comment

    i so agree...i mean come on they gave it to punk for a month, then jericho, now batista. i at least wanted jericho to hold it a lil longer so he could face randy orton or cena then let the belt change hands and management need to get their act together

    da great 1...
    October 27, 2008
    05:10 PM EST

    I don't really disagree with you but I did predict Batista would get the title if not at the PPV at the Raw taping after because I had a feeling he was promised it when he was drafted to Raw and had to forego his already requested time off that he had asked for befor Randy, Edge, Taker, and John, I know Randy and Johns were accidents and couldn't be forseen but still he was in line first and then got shunted back and drafted too so they sort of owed him something, and I know most wont agree but thats the politics of business in the WWE for you, you need to give some to get some. As far as Taker and Big Shows match I got that right and It was a pretty hard hitting match, Taker put Big Show over AGAIN big time, and that is why he is and always will be and always has been greatly respected by the fans. I just have this to say, please please let him deliver on his original promise to send Vickie to hell because the longer it doesn't happen the less credible he looks as the Deadman, the Phenom, The Undertaker, whoever he is seen as, it's been a bit too long not to have delivered when he has been able to. Now for Jeff and Triple Hs match, my most sorest of points, you said "or has Triple Hs ego got the better of him again" and I say "what do you mean again" "still" is the correct word for that sentence. And the answer is obviously YES IT HAS, STILL, I so wanted Jeff to win and I really believed he wrestled better than H and it should have been his win. My belief now is Jeff won't get a belt until someone bigger than H gets it off him (namely the Undertaker) and then and only then does Jeff stand a REAL chance of winning the belt. Taker isn't SO FAR UP HIMSELF that he won't lose graciously to someone in Jeffs calibre and of Jeffs popularity to help out his career, he's done it plenty before. Anyhow, thanks for your blog and the opportunity to rant.

    downundermum
    October 27, 2008
    09:11 PM EST