Script: /orange.one
SEARCH & WIN
SEARCH UNIVERSE
    ADVERTISEMENT

About This Group

    WE WILL DISCUSS ALL 3 BRANDS STORYLINES AND PICK WHICH IS BAD WHICH IS GOOD. AND GIVE YOUR THOUGHTS ON HOW YOU WOULD WRITE STORYLINES OR HOW TO MAKE THE ONE'S ON TV BETTER.

Group Members


  • poison 2.0


  • rickie


  • JAMANS


  • dsd310580


  • rkogirl11


  • Irish Blac
    k Matt Giv
    en

    THE 22 MINUTE DEATH OF ECW

    Wednesday, September 24, 2008, 10:07 PM EST [General]
    Posted By: ROB

    Let me refresh your memories or maybe even educate some of you on the real reason ECW or atleast the E for EXTREME has been dead since 2006? Do you all remember ECW December to Dismember!!! It was really the 1st WWE all ECW pay-per-view that wasn't a One Night Stand!! On the card that night was An Extreme elmination chamber match for the ECW Title. That night Bobby Lashley would become ECW champion!

    Now Paul Heyman from my view had some atonomy when it came to running ECW even thought it wasn't his anymore. From Storyline conception to talent Paul seemed to be the one still in charge of the Kool-Aid. I really believed in my heart of hearts that ECW was back look at all the Extreme rules matches. Big Show and Ric Flair (yes i said Ric Flair) Had the best Hardcore matches I have ever seen!! RVD vs. Hardcore Holly when Holly had his back tore open and was bledding like there was no tomorrow Holly even finished the match!!!

    But back to my orginal thought here. The 1st thing i remember thinking about was the Event didn't even have a huge card or bulid up only The main event Extreme Elmination Chamber match. But then again when you have 2 pay-per-views in one month it does seem a little hetic,I mean after all I believe WWE was just looking at $ signs when it came to ECW and not the actual brand itself. But the one person who believed in ECW still was Paul Heyman.

    Now your standard WWE pay-per-view usually lasts till around 10:45-10:50 PM. On this night the ECW pay-per-view got over at 10:28 PM. And was Vince or the high up's what ever coin you flip were inscensed that this happen. And the next thing I remember is Paul Heyman on TV apoplogizing and in Tears for what had happen. And this was the very last time we ever saw Paul Heyman in the WWE or ECW. And ever since then the Kool-Aid hasan't been the same in matter of a fact I don't know what we have been drinking for the last 2 years.

    We've gone from the bingo hall to the penthouse and in my view i loved the bingo hall better than anything else. There have been some great WWE-ECW momements but none that will ever top Paul Heyman's ECW and that's what ECW needs if it intends to survive. But I will always remember the 22 minutes that killed ECW forever.

    3.7 (1 Ratings)

    Does ECW Need Another Title?

    Sunday, September 21, 2008, 01:51 AM EST [General]
    Posted By: nhpiersee

    I just finished this blog a few minutes ago for my profile and thought it would b a perfect blog for this group aswell. I have yet to post anything for this group and I thought this would b a great way to introduce what I bring to the table. It reads as follows:

    I posted a blog very similar to this awhile ago. I posted it to just the people in this group I was in. The group has since disbanded and I want everyone's opinion on this subject matter.

    I think that ECW has too many wrestlers to have one championship. It's frustrating to me sometimes. There is amazing talent on ECW. They most definately deserve another title.

    RAW has the I.C. Title. Smackdown has the U.S. Title. I think it is perfectly logical that ECW have the T.V. Title. The original ECW actually had a T.V. Championship. So why not the new one?

    I never saw the original ECW, but I did watch WCW. WCW also had a T.V. Title. The concept of the T.V. Title is, if u r the champion, u defend the title every time ur @ T.V. Now, that means every Tues. on ECW and every PPV there will b a T.V. Title match. That was the hook of that particular belt. U had to defend ur title against all comers and @ every T.V. program. U had to b good to keep the belt for a long period of time.

    If I were a writer, I would've brought in the T.V. Championship around the begining of 2007. I would've had a large tournament to decide who is gonna b the 1st titleholder. I would've had CM Punk win the T.V. Title. He could spend the next few months defending his title in classic matches like I know he would. Then, after a nice healthy title reign, I would have him lose the belt to John Morrison (he was still Johnny Nitro then). Throwing other talent into the mix too, I would have Punk and Morrison pass the belt back and forth for the rest of the year. Then they could move into ECW Title contention.

    Finaly, Matt Hardy, Evan Bourne, Tommy Dreamer, Kevin Thorne, Elijah Bourke (where the hell have they been?) and Shelton Benjamin all could make that belt as prestigious as the I.C. or U.S. titles in no time.

    3.7 (1 Ratings)

    Discussion on all three brands of wwe

    Thursday, September 18, 2008, 12:11 AM EST [General]
    Posted By: smurf

    Don't get me wrong, I love all three brands of the wwe, but sometimes Vince really needs to leave well enough alone.

    For instance, ECW, it had this kick ass song when it came on and ECW was this really bad ass wrestling show where you could see some awsome wild and crazy stuff. Now, it's just boring to me compared to what it used to be. I used to dring coke or whatever I needed to just to make sure I was awake to watch ECW and now it's like, oh well, if I miss it they will show what happened on Friday night Smackdown.

    Another thing about ECW is that in order of me to even have the oportunity to see it, I have to have this cable box which costs me an additional $20.00 per month just so that I can get the channel that is on. I already pay enough for my phone, internet, and regular cable all on one bill so I have had to unhook this box and give it back to the cable company because ECW is just not worth seeing any more for an additional $5.00 a week. I know that it does not sound like a lot, but it does add up over the months. Especially when you have kids to support and the economy right now.

    Besides that, with the way they have been having the wrestlers go from one show to another all of the time, you are bound to see the wrestlers from ECW on either RAW or SmackDown.

    Tami

     

    3.7 (1 Ratings)

Comments


    Leave a Comment | View All Comments

    yer hi

    there should be a new wwe and not hhh or john cena or edge someone like kofi kingston kane mvp not the same champs all the time

    p.s make it a triple threat match tlc at summerslam jeff vs punk vs matt hardy

    bring back the old ecw

    rickie
    August 14, 2009
    04:12 PM EST

    A STORYLINE, (FOR SMACKDOWN) VICKI SEES EDGE MAKIN OUT WITH A DIVA (DOESNT MATTER WHICH ONE) VICKI GOES UP TO EDGE AND SLAPS HIM " I WANNA DIVORCE. IM GOING TOMAKE YOU LIFE A LIVING HELL" THEN SHE TRIPS HIM OF THE TITLE, IT TURNS VACCANT THEN THERE IS A WHOLE ROSTER ROYAL RUMBLE. THEN IT IS EDGE VS. THE WINNER. EGDE WINS, VICKI STRIPS THE TITLE AGAIN. EDGE TRIES TO MAKE IT UP TO HER BUT NOTHING WORKS. SOMEONE CAN ADD ON FROM THERE.

    rkogirl11
    March 01, 2009
    05:41 PM EST

    Storyline Central, there's just 1 spot left! I'm looking for someone to GM/write for my fantasy booking wrestling group. Run your own promotion as you decide the outcome! You will have FULL CONTROL. You will wrie a weekly show and a monthly ppv. If you're interested in becoming GM, go to Ultimate Fantasy Wrestling at fans.wwe.com/theultimatef... and look at the roster for Hardknocks Championship Wrestling in the comments section. Then either click Contact Owner or message me at fans.wwe.com/doom2u We are also looking for members to critique and give their opinions. We do value your thoughts.



    Legion.

    Legion
    September 02, 2008
    08:26 PM EST

    HOW COME THEY NEVER DO IT IN TEXAS YOU KNOW LIKE IN DALAS OR WHAT EVER OTHER THAN IN HOUSTAN OTHER THAN THE MANIA

    mickiejamesluver1
    August 04, 2008
    12:38 PM EST