I posted a blog very similar to this awhile ago. I posted it to just the people in this group I was in. The group has since disbanded and I want everyone's opinion on this subject matter.

I think that ECW has too many wrestlers to have one championship. It's frustrating to me sometimes. There is amazing talent on ECW. They most definately deserve another title.

RAW has the I.C. Title. Smackdown has the U.S. Title. I think it is perfectly logical that ECW have the T.V. Title. The original ECW actually had a T.V. Championship. So why not the new one.

I never saw the original ECW, but I did watch WCW. WCW also had a T.V. Title. The concept of the T.V. Title is, if u r the champion, u defend the title every time ur @ T.V. Now, that means every Tues. on ECW and every PPV there will b a T.V. Title match. That was the hook of that particular belt. U had to defend ur title against all comers and @ every T.V. program. U had to b good to keep the belt for a long period of time.

If I were a writer, I would've brought in the T.V. Championship around the begining of 2007. I would've had a large tournament to decide who is gonna b the 1st titleholder. I would've had CM Punk win the T.V. Title. He could spend the next few months defending his title in classic matches like I know he would. Then, after a nice healthy title reign, I would have him lose the belt to John Morrison (he was still Johnny Nitro then). Throwing other talent into the mix too, I would have Punk and Morrison pass the belt back and forth for the rest of the year. Then they could move into ECW Title contention.

Finaly, Matt Hardy, Evan Bourne, Tommy Dreamer, Kevin Thorne, Elijah Bourke (where the hell have they been?) and Shelton Benjamin all could make that belt as prestigious as the I.C. or U.S. titles in no time.