you bring up some excellent points. but i must argue that brock leznar falls into the same category as say vladimir kozlov. both guys show up out of no where are put in high profile situation and immediate career push off of the bat so they can in my opinion peak fast and fizzle out. leznar was pushed fast rose to the top got bored and left. while say hulk hogan another guy who was around for years before getting any serious recognition. infact the hulkster had to revamp his character and thus hulkamania was born. the rock, john cena, stone cold, HBK all guys that had a change in there character and all of a sudden wow a fan following. what my point is here is all these guys had to take some time to find the niche before they were givin serious pushes because they needed to build a following. were you a fan of the attitude era? the rock and stone cold feuded for the better part of a decade and the WWE title was passed back and forth between just those two super stars numerous times. would you call that time boring I wouldnt. infact in my opinion those were probably the best matches produced in the last 20 years. you say people dont want to see that again i must disagree. those guys headlined 4 Wrestlemanias and had numerous matches on raw. i think alot of people here would agree with me that seeing another rock vs stone cold match would draw more of a crowd than the upcoming HHH vs kozlov match. you also brought up jeff hardy and referanced him as young guy. again i must disagree. jeff hardy has been around my friend. he made his debut against Razor Ramon at the age of 16 before the attitude era. jeff has been in numerous matches through his near decade long career winning the IC title 4 times and numerous tag team titles but has never been put in a high profile situation up until recently. jeff hardy deserved the push hes gotten in recent months. what has a vladimir kozlov proved aside from the fact that he a crappy knock off of a villain from a rocky movie?