After a 7 month hiatus... the House is back! Sorry for not posting in all that time, but I had other stuff that needed my attention and since I only averaged five readers each time I posted this, I didn't think I'd be missed by too many people. That said, time to get things going...

I know the Judgment Day PPV has come and gone, but I want to go back a tough of something from that real quick. In a promo Jeff Hardy pointed out the fact that when Edge wins the title he then loses it in his first defense. As soon as he said that I knew Jeff would not be winning the title at Judgment Day because, 99.9% of the time whenever someone points something like that out about their opponent in a promo, it doesn't happen. That being said, I'm still thinking Jeff will not win at Extreme Rules either because it's pretty obvious that the WWE thinks more of Edge than they do of Jeff.

Please get Santino out of drag. No one is buying this "twin sister" B.S. It wasn't entertaining at WrestleMania XXV when it started and it's still not entertianing. It's really sad. There have been reports that Vince is "down" on the Divas matches again, but what do expect when your main focus of the division is a joke of a former Intercontinental champion dressed in drag. If you want to use Santino as a comedy act, then do it, if he doesn't care then neither do I, but get him out of the Divas' matches and don't even get me started on that abortion of a match at Extreme Rules with Vickie Guerrero.

Speaking of Extreme Rules, I must say that I hate that PPV name. One Night Stand is a million times better and they should have just stuck with that name. The WWE is reportedly thinking of adding a Submissions themed PPV to the calanader and I have to express my distain for that idea. WWE has too match PPVs as it is now. Having two or three weeks between PPvs to build feuds and announce matches is a joke. If WWE wants us to pay to watch their PPVs they seriously neeed to cut the number to one per month, maximum, and actually build feuds and quit trying to rely on "name power" to sell PPVs.

Getting back to the Divas for a moment, after reading some blogs and other things around the net I know for a fact that I'm not the only one that is completly perplexed by the recent Maryse/Kelly Kelly feud. Who did Mickie James anger to get thrown to the side like she has been? After two straight pin falls over Maryse, Mickie is suddenly pushed to the side and Kelly is given the shot (and to you K2 fans reading this blog, this is not a dig at Kelly in any way) that she, in my opinion, shouldn't be getting quite yet. Now if WWE was going for the "swerve" by having Kelly win the Battle Royal for a contendership that should have been Mickie's anyway, that's OK. A swerve is a nice way to keep us "smarks" guessing a bit. But then the following week Mickie is stuck in a match with Santino and is no where to be seen in the Divas title match that has an ending that makes absolutely no sense to me (a DQ for pushing Kelly into the table? Really? WTF?) and leaves the ending open for a Maryse/Kelly rematch and looks as if Mickie's "feud" with Maryse is done before it even got started. And with Michelle McCool the number one contender to the Women's title on Smackdown now, I'm begining to smell an Undertaker dating rat having something to do with it. Read into that whatever you want.

Nice to see David Hart (don't call me Harry) Smith back up on one of the main show rosters finally. His group with Kidd and Natalya should be good if handled right. Their feud with Finaly has me thinking that, with the talk of calling up Sheamus O'Shaunessy from the developmental system, now might be the time to do it and pair him up with his fellow Irishman to counter act the numbers The Hart Trilogy currently have. However, that probably won't happen because it makes too much sense and we all know how WWE hates to do that recently.

That's it for this edition. Until next time...