SourcE: JRsBarBQ.com

Here's what Ross said:

Lance Cade had his WWE contract terminated a few days ago which completely caught me off guard. As I wrote a few days ago, I was and still am a fan of Lance's and was shocked when I heard news of his dismissal. I feel confident that Lance will rebound from this misstep and find the success that many feel he deserves. Nonetheless, for some to compare Lance's incident where he had a seizure on an airplane that necessitated an emergency trip to a hospital with Jeff Hardy being asked to leave a plane because it was perceived that he was allegedly intoxicated seems like a stretch to me. Neither individual was on the right side of the equation of their respective issues but Lance, unfortunately, came too close for comfort by incurring a life threatening seizure and put the WWE in a position to make a really tough call. Could this matter have been handled better? I have no idea as I was not in the loop, thankfully, but I do feel that at some point in the future, and this is simply my opinion, after enough water has gone under the bridge that both parties could well do business again with each other.

My only question is this: Lance Cade had a seizure; fine, but is this a good reason to release him from his contract. He can heal just like any other superstar can. WWE is not responsible for his seizure or anything so I really don't see why they needed to release him. Why can't WWE let him heal, and then let him come back to fight?

Anyone agree? If you do or don't, either way, let me know in comments! Please explain this to me. Thanks ;]