Nov 6, 2009 -- 12:56PM, νινα "тнє нιтмαи" тнємιzσ wrote:

That's what happens when guns are so easily accessible.

your all full of it this is what happens when you let every one in the usa with see who they are   guns are not that easy to get

Nov 6, 2009 -- 12:58PM, Vινα Lα Rαzα wrote:

Nov 6, 2009 -- 12:56PM, νινα "тнє нιтмαи" тнємιzσ wrote:

That's what happens when guns are so easily accessible.

I agree.

I wonder if it was another terrorist.

What are the laws there viva? about guns?

Nov 6, 2009 -- 1:02PM, the original wrestlemaniac wrote:

I wonder if it was another terrorist.

What are the laws there viva? about guns?

Considering they took no Hostages I don't think it was a terrorist.

1968 Firearms Act

The 1968 Firearms Act brought together all existing firearms legislation in a single statute. Disregarding minor changes, it formed the legal basis for British firearms control policy until 1988 when the Firearms (Amendment) Act was rushed through Parliament in the aftermath of the 1987 Hungerford massacre. For the first time, it introduced controls for long-barrelled shotguns, in the form of shotgun certificates which, like firearm certificates, were issued by an area's chief constable in England, Scotland, and Wales. The Act did not require the registration of shotguns, only licensing.[10] Also, while applicants for firearms certificates had to show a good reason for possessing the weapon or ammunition, this did not apply to shotgun certificates.

The Act also prohibited the possession of firearms or ammunition by convicted criminals who had been sentenced to imprisonment; those sentenced to three months to three years imprisonment were banned from possessing firearms or ammunition for five years, while those sentenced to longer terms were banned for life. However, an application could be made to have the prohibition removed.[19]

The Act was accompanied by an amnesty when many older weapons were handed into the police. It has remained a feature of British policing that from time-to-time a brief firearms amnesty is often declared.[20]

Changes in public attitudes in the 1970s and 1980s changed the basis on which firearms were perceived and understood in British society. Increasingly graphic portrayals of firearms involved in gratuitous acts of violence in the mass media gave rise to concern of the emergence of an aggressive "gun culture". A steady rise in violent gun crime[citation needed] generally also became an issue of concern.

Also:

Following the awarding of the 2012 Olympic Games to London, the government announced that special dispensation would be granted to allow the various shooting events to go ahead, as had been the case previously for the 2002 Commonwealth Games. However, it was still illegal for Britain's top pistol shooters to train in England, Scotland or Wales. As a result, British shooters currently spend 20 to 30 days a year training in Switzerland, and receive no public sports funding because their events are considered illegal in the UK.

Nov 6, 2009 -- 1:04PM, Angela wrote:

Guns are EXTREMELY easy to get in the states lol

Not surprised about Fort Hood though... it's a really bad time to be in the service. And being at the biggest US base can't help any. The thing at Fort Hood wasn't a terrorist though.

He wasnt?  I hate the media.  Saying he was a muslim and stuff.  That gets people thinking.