Dec 15, 2008 -- 4:16PM, Down WIT D-LO wrote:

im happy for jeff, i still think he should have won it in 03 before he left for tna, the match in 02 vs taker waslike handing the torch, but ppl like hhh held him back, but whats the point of making edge champ if he was gonna loose it in less than a month... reminds me of WCW the good ol days


as for cena, jericho should have never lost it in the first place, and im talking about his feud with batisteroids.

jericho beats hardy on raw, but hardy is new champ. jericho has the liontamer locked in for a long time, cena doesnt tap, cena locks in the stfu for a few seconds, jericho taps like a lil ****.


WHO WRITES THIS ****?

John Cena is supposed to be the hero in this scenario. He would not look very heroic if he tapped out immediately to the WOJ. Jericho on the other hand is supposed to be the villian. Villians are perceived to be cowards for the most part and for a villian to tap out to a submission hold isn't that uncommon. It would have made better sense for Cena to just hold out from tapping until the pain was to much and he passed out. That way, he would have lost and still kept his status as a hero. He didn't give up. Of course that wasn't the way it was drawn out to happen but if it had been, that would have been the only logical way to do it.

Dec 15, 2008 -- 5:12PM, Chris~1/20 of the young lions and 1/2 of the Extreme people~ wrote:

If you are mature you will understand.. as far as last night goes, the era that steph was speaking about is the kids era! Jeez batista, hardy, and cena won? Come on seriously! You look at the crowd when cena, batista or hardy comes out you hear kids screaming! It is ridiculous.. I honestly am sick of the young fans who have not a clue who ric flair or the rock or RICKY STEAMBOAT or even stone cold!! Im tired of it.. Thats my rant and to finish it off.. an rko on batista.. enjoy!http://fans.wwe.com/chaos2/gallery/view … d=45144778

Just because we enjoyed those superstars that you mentioned, doesn't mean that everyone should have to. I like to think that with this still being a free country that people are entitled to like who they want. Like it or not, the kids in the crowd are tomorrow's WWE fans. By the time they get to be our age, guys like Cena, Batista and Hardy will have achieved the legendary status of the Ric Flairs, the Ricky Steamboats and the Stone Cold Steve Austins. You have to remember that none of the legends that you mentioned were legends from the start. It took fans like us to make them legends.

Dec 15, 2008 -- 5:22PM, Undertakerrules wrote:

Dec 15, 2008 -- 5:12PM, Chris~1/20 of the young lions and 1/2 of the Extreme people~ wrote:

If you are mature you will understand.. as far as last night goes, the era that steph was speaking about is the kids era! Jeez batista, hardy, and cena won? Come on seriously! You look at the crowd when cena, batista or hardy comes out you hear kids screaming! It is ridiculous.. I honestly am sick of the young fans who have not a clue who ric flair or the rock or RICKY STEAMBOAT or even stone cold!! Im tired of it.. Thats my rant and to finish it off.. an rko on batista.. enjoy!http://fans.wwe.com/chaos2/gallery/view … d=45144778

Just because we enjoyed those superstars that you mentioned, doesn't mean that everyone should have to. I like to think that with this still being a free country that people are entitled to like who they want. Like it or not, the kids in the crowd are tomorrow's WWE fans. By the time they get to be our age, guys like Cena, Batista and Hardy will have achieved the legendary status of the Ric Flairs, the Ricky Steamboats and the Stone Cold Steve Austins. You have to remember that none of the legends that you mentioned were legends from the start. It took fans like us to make them legends.

True but i think that when they are mentioned today people reflect on the good.. Im not discriminating anyone for liking cena and hardy its just that the age group wwe is in right now. Understand?