Nov 7, 2009 -- 3:08PM, nikki wrote:

wow wwe how does randy orton a man whom pretty much got born into the biz cuz of association with last name becomes youngest world champ ever at tender age of 24 who bearly had to work hard to get where hes at

while..

finlay,benoit,regal,and eddie guerrero literally busted their ass for this buisness for years and years and bearly got nothing to prove for it as much as world title reigns..eddies reign as champ sucked and benoits reign was decent but only held it once while regal and finlay NEVER held world title and all these guys way more talented than orton as far as wrestling goes!!

way to go vince,thus why wwe has always been looked as a laughing stock in the world of pro wrestling in other companies and countries cause its all entertainment joke drama bs when its suppose to be WRESTLING

yea thats true and same with all of Legacy

Nov 7, 2009 -- 3:16PM, "Tha Franchise Playa" Snyder wrote:

Newsflash...Orton isnt synonymous with greatness in WWE. Cowboy Bob Orton won ZERO titles in the WWE. Bob Orton Sr. was no higher than a regional champion in Florida. So yeah..to say Orton only became World Champion because of his name is absolutely ludacris.

Orton became the youngest World Champion simply to get Brock Lesnar's name out of the record book because he left putting a sour taste in the WWE's mouth. Granted, Lesnar is still the youngest WWE Champion in history but as far as the youngest World Champion in WWE history, he is no longer.

Also, Orton had the essential IT factor and the look of a champion whereas the guys like Benoit, Eddie and Finlay do/did not. Benoit had little to no charisma or mic skills , Eddie was solid but only a solid attraction to the Hispanic demographic and Finlay is the same as Benoit. Those do not draw the crowds. Look at Hogan, Rock and Austin. Not exactly what you call great wrestlers yet are the biggest draws in the company's history.

um i wanna see wrestling,wrestling,wrestling and lets see WRESTLING

i know its a buisness but who cares wwe prolly wonders why its wrestling is never taken seriously by other organizations and dats the exact reason..its entertainment bs

eddie only appealed to hispanic demographic? u see his reaction when his tenture in ecw the fans loved him and were saddened to see him leave and they were american

Nov 7, 2009 -- 3:21PM, nikki wrote:

Nov 7, 2009 -- 3:16PM, "Tha Franchise Playa" Snyder wrote:

Newsflash...Orton isnt synonymous with greatness in WWE. Cowboy Bob Orton won ZERO titles in the WWE. Bob Orton Sr. was no higher than a regional champion in Florida. So yeah..to say Orton only became World Champion because of his name is absolutely ludacris.

Orton became the youngest World Champion simply to get Brock Lesnar's name out of the record book because he left putting a sour taste in the WWE's mouth. Granted, Lesnar is still the youngest WWE Champion in history but as far as the youngest World Champion in WWE history, he is no longer.

Also, Orton had the essential IT factor and the look of a champion whereas the guys like Benoit, Eddie and Finlay do/did not. Benoit had little to no charisma or mic skills , Eddie was solid but only a solid attraction to the Hispanic demographic and Finlay is the same as Benoit. Those do not draw the crowds. Look at Hogan, Rock and Austin. Not exactly what you call great wrestlers yet are the biggest draws in the company's history.

um i wanna see wrestling,wrestling,wrestling and lets see WRESTLING

i know its a buisness but who cares wwe prolly wonders why its wrestling is never taken seriously by other organizations and dats the exact reason..its entertainment bs

eddie only appealed to hispanic demographic? u see his reaction when his tenture in ecw the fans loved him and were saddened to see him leave and they were american

Actual wrestling does not appeal to the general public. If it did, ameteur wrestling would be a very popular sport.

Actual wrestlers do not draw huge crowds and there have been very few exceptions to that including Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels and Kurt Angle, although none of them were quite the draws as say The Rock or Ultimate Warrior.

Is that why when Eddie was champion..ratings for Smackdown were horrible? It's proof enough that he wasn't a draw and people are only disagreeing with that sentiment because we sadly lost him. Eddie was a good wrestler, yes but that does mean he should have been World Champion? No, he did not have the appeal of a World Champion.

Nov 7, 2009 -- 3:08PM, nikki wrote:

wow wwe how does randy orton a man whom pretty much got born into the biz cuz of association with last name becomes youngest world champ ever at tender age of 24 who bearly had to work hard to get where hes at

while..

finlay,benoit,regal,and eddie guerrero literally busted their ass for this buisness for years and years and bearly got nothing to prove for it as much as world title reigns..eddies reign as champ sucked and benoits reign was decent but only held it once while regal and finlay NEVER held world title and all these guys way more talented than orton as far as wrestling goes!!

way to go vince,thus why wwe has always been looked as a laughing stock in the world of pro wrestling in other companies and countries cause its all entertainment joke drama bs when its suppose to be WRESTLING

exactly