Oct 3, 2009 -- 4:36PM, ..EdgeHead.. wrote:

read few lines..that was enough..http://fans.wwe.com/raunoboy/gallery/vi … d=87584688

post count raised..leaves thread.

It took you a week to write that garbage?! Can't tell if your being serious or not, I kinda hope not as you've gone completely off the deep end if your are!
Not at any point did I get what you were trying to put across, it was full of vague accustions and boring reality removed metaphors.
Heres a tip, next time you feel the need to write more bollocks, either get to the point early or if you really must right a dozen paragraphs ( saying the same thing only in ever more dull ways) try and keep it interesting and light hearted.
I hope you know thats 5 minutes of my life I'll never see again.

LOL thanks for the inspiration dude.  Complaint genarator rules.

Oct 3, 2009 -- 4:18PM, The Sublime Shake wrote:

In response to Chris 'Jericho" Irvine's warnings, I would like to offer the following opposing points. The following text regards my complaints of recent days against Chris and his subtle but meretricious attempts to pigeonhole people into predetermined categories. We find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that he does the things he does "for the children". This belief is due to a basic confusion that can be cleared up simply by stating that Chris and I are as different as chalk and cheese. He, for instance, wants to encourage every sort of indiscipline and degeneracy in the name of freedom. I, on the other hand, want to treat the disease, not the symptoms. That's why I need to tell you that before he once again claims that you and I are inferior to disaffected polluters, he should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with his attendants.

Chris has gotten away with so much for so long that he's lost all sense of caution, all sense of limits. If you think about it, only a man without any sense of limits could desire to deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. Obstinate revisionism is the shadow cast on society by his false-flag operations, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. I know some bloodthirsty hell-raisers who actually believe that he is the arbiter of all things. Incredible? Those same people have told me that Chris is a model citizen. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that his helots have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation.

You, of course, now need some hard evidence that Chris always tries to shift blame from himself to ultra-brutal whiners. Well, how about this for evidence: He likes to compare his exegeses to those that shaped this nation. The comparison, however, doesn't hold up beyond some uselessly broad, superficial similarities that are so vague and pointless, it's not even worth summarizing them. I find it necessary, if I am to meet my reader on something like a common ground of understanding, to point out that if we don't do something soon, his inimical wisecracks will rise like a golem with a million hands on a million throats to choke the honor out of decent, hardworking people.

This moral issue will eventually be rendered academic by the fact that Chris's monographs promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Chris's allies because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Chris. Whenever he announces that the majority of twisted, mutinous slobs are heroes, if not saints, his representatives applaud on cue and the accolades are long and ostentatious. What's funny is that they don't provide similar feedback whenever I tell them that Chris is planning to undermine the current world order. This does not bode well for the future because he used to maintain that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that he considers bloody-minded or unbalanced. When he realized that no one was falling for that claptrap, he changed his tune to say that ebola, AIDS, mad-cow disease, and the hantavirus were intentionally bioengineered by jealous usurers for the purpose of population reduction. Chris is indubitably a shambolic liar, and shame on anyone who believes him.

Chris plans to stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest. What can you do about that? Start by reading about how Chris's squadristi are once again out begging for signatures for some wanton petition that makes it legal for Chris to cause the destruction of human ambition and joy. Become informed about the deceit, lies, and propaganda surrounding Chris's promotion of antagonism. Tell everyone you know that if he bites me I will really bite back.

So who's crazy? I, or all the wild, disingenuous nabobs of antinomianism who allege that the world's salvation comes from whims, irrationality, and delusions? Before you answer, let me point out that I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival. If Chris ever claims that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune, we must answer only one thing: "No, the reverse is true." The one thing that's central to all of his amoral platitudes is a desire to truck away our freedoms for safekeeping. I call this the New Absolutism. The old absolutism was concerned only with making my blood curdle. Although that was bad enough, we must act against injustice, whether it concerns drunk driving, domestic violence, or even mysticism. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to seek some structure in which the cacophony introduced by his prognoses might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational. You must be the one to stop Chris's encroachments on our heritage. And you must inform your fellow man that Chris has somehow made up his mind that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. It seems to me that what he is doing is jumping to a hasty conclusion in the absence of adequate data. A more reasoned analysis would reveal that we ought to ask the tough questions and not shy away from the tough answers. That'll make Chris think once—I would have said "twice" but I don't see any indication that he has previously given any thought to the matter—before trying to break up society's solidarity and cohesiveness.

Here, I am merely trying to advance the opinion that it is crystal-clear that the law of parsimony suggests that even when Chris bespeaks us fair to our faces he expresses quite different thoughts behind our backs. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that unless you define success using the sort of loosey-goosey standards by which Chris abides you'll realize that true measures of success involve telling you a little bit about Chris and his uppity hatchet jobs. Success is getting the world to see that Chris has called people like me jaundiced demoniacs, shallow, mendacious beggars, and merciless, militant egotists so many times that these accusations no longer have any sting. Chris truly continues to employ such insults because he's run out of logical arguments. I suppose an alternate explanation is that Chris's epithets are filled with a number of very clear-cut and blatant lies—lies of both omission and commission. That's self-evident, and even Chris would probably agree with me on that. Even so, he maintains that the Universe belongs to him by right. While that happens to be pure fantasy from the world of make-believe, one important fact to consider is that his apostles are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is Chris 'Jericho" Irvine, who wants nothing less than to inaugurate an era of rummy ethnocentrism.

Chris's comments are often appallingly boisterous, sometimes stultiloquent, frequently off-point, and occasionally venal. Nevertheless, they do tell us something important about Chris. They tell us that Chris intends to pursue a twofold credo of jingoism and extremism. Purists may object to my failure to present specific examples of his semi-intelligible manifestos. Fortunately, I do have an explanation for this omission. The explanation demands an understanding of how Chris exhibits a startling lack of remorse, shame, and guilt for so brazenly attempting to worsen an already unstable situation—and Chris knows it.

Namby-pamby, brutish extremists are born, not made. That dictum is as unimpeachable as the "poeta nascitur, non fit" that it echoes and as irreproachable as the brocard that I have to wonder where Chris got the idea that it is my view that embracing a system of priggism will make everything right with the world. This sits hard with me because it is simply not true and I've never written anything to imply that it is. It is well known that I find him the most obtrusive person in the world. But he has not increased our safety, security, or happiness by stirring up trouble. All he's increased by doing that is the girth of his bloated ego. Chris coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his adages sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary.

I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke Chris for trying to deliver an additional blow to dignity and self-worth. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, we must show Chris that we are not powerless pedestrians on the asphalt of life. We must show him that we can put the kibosh on his mind games. Maybe then Chris will realize that he doesn't care about freedom as he can neither eat it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to him. Before you read this letter, you might have thought that big emotions come from big words. Now you know that it is morally unjustifiable for Chris 'Jericho" Irvine to offer stones instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world.

THIS! :D Great work, miss lady.

Oct 4, 2009 -- 1:46PM, Frosty Jack wrote:

It took you a week to write that garbage?! Can't tell if your being serious or not, I kinda hope not as you've gone completely off the deep end if your are!
Not at any point did I get what you were to put across, it was full of vague accustions and boring reality removed metaphors.
Heres a tip, next time you feel the need to write more bollocks, either get to the point early or if you really must right a dozen paragraphs ( saying the same thing only in ever more dull ways) try and keep it interesting and light hearted.
I hope you know thats 5 minutes of my life I'll never see again.

This post = more useful than the thread