May 29, 2009 -- 11:37PM, HßKLOVER96™ wrote:

May 29, 2009 -- 11:33PM, Michael wrote:

May 29, 2009 -- 11:24PM, HßKLOVER96™ wrote:

May 29, 2009 -- 11:18PM, Michael wrote:

May 29, 2009 -- 11:12PM, HßKLOVER96™ wrote:

May 29, 2009 -- 11:08PM, Michael wrote:

May 29, 2009 -- 10:56PM, HßKLOVER96™ wrote:

LOL...WWE is stupid for this. Ah well, I just look forward to hearing the news of TNA picking up the talented Mr. Kennedy.

Why is everyone calling WWE stupid, when they have no idea WHY this was done?

We don't know what was going on backstage, or how Kennedy handled his injury. He may have opened his mouth, said the wrong thing....and the boss fired him.

I love how everyone is screaming, as if Kennedy's glass constitution is the company's fault.

If he does go to TNA, I hope he does well... Maybe realizing that he's not owed anything, will be a wake up call for him...and he can live up to some of the monstrous hype that the IWC has been furiously posting about for so long now.

I could really care less why Mr. Kennedy was fired. Firing a guy like him was utter stupidity. He could've really been great for that company, but oh well, he'll just go throw it in Vince's face in TNA.

He could have been great...if he stayed of the injured list. You DON'T pay guys to stay at home...and contribute nothing to your company?

You really think business ideas like yours would actually be profitable? Seriously?

Why is it never the entertainers fault, just because he has fans... he had to get "screwed"? Especially when the WWE has been VERY patient with him...and treated him well, despite his recent history?

It could've been his fault. In all likely-hood, it probably was his fault. I just feel like being a mark right now though, so I'm choosing to go beyond face-value and take it the way I want to.

So let me be a mark while you go read Smark 101.

Has nothing to do with being a smark my friend..it's logic. I'd say the same of any talent on the roster.

I do credit you for your honesty though.

I understand completely, but shhh, I'm not supposed to because well, I'm being a mark, the "dumb" ones.

And you're welcome. Obviously I know it most likely was Kennedy's fault. WWE has been patient with the guy, I've been patient with him. I simply just like Mr. Kennedy and will continue to like him.

Who says he even has to wrestle though? He'd be a great commentator or even a potential manager. Mr. Kennedy is a guy that can be used in many ways because he's very skilled.

I'd have loved to see Kennedy replace Cole myself.

It's just that we don't know. It's possible that he just ran his mouth...and burned himself with Vince. I'm not sure many in the locker room would be happy with the guy...as he's been given a few pushes, that I'm sure others would like.