Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:54AM, the noan wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:51AM, cena rules wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:47AM, Smoo wrote:

Cheap production value doesn't mean its a crappier company. Its the show that matters, not which building it is in or if it has a bigger crowd or not.

Its laughable to think that RVD is "talentless" and I'm sure many people would agree with me.The old ECW had good storylines and wrestling it was an alternative to WCW and WWE which is what made it popular, it had a variety of good quality wrestling, high flying wrestlers, and hardcore styled matches.

The new ECW has worse quality wrestling and storylines. Sure it has a better production value because its with the WWE, its not the "real" ECW because of that.

ECW was never good until wwe bought ecw, and RVD is talentless because if he was talented then why isnt he with wwe right now????
The old ecw had skinny anorexic wrestler who were spot monkey's just fly around the ring and that was not entertaining at all. But now ecw is good because guys like ricky ortiz and hornswaggle are great and very talented

he isnt with the wwe because his wife got the cancer so he left

thats not a good excuse for leaving wwe, the good excuse is that he sucked and he is an untalented wrestler

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:58AM, cena rules wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:54AM, the noan wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:51AM, cena rules wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:47AM, Smoo wrote:

Cheap production value doesn't mean its a crappier company. Its the show that matters, not which building it is in or if it has a bigger crowd or not.

Its laughable to think that RVD is "talentless" and I'm sure many people would agree with me.The old ECW had good storylines and wrestling it was an alternative to WCW and WWE which is what made it popular, it had a variety of good quality wrestling, high flying wrestlers, and hardcore styled matches.

The new ECW has worse quality wrestling and storylines. Sure it has a better production value because its with the WWE, its not the "real" ECW because of that.

ECW was never good until wwe bought ecw, and RVD is talentless because if he was talented then why isnt he with wwe right now????
The old ecw had skinny anorexic wrestler who were spot monkey's just fly around the ring and that was not entertaining at all. But now ecw is good because guys like ricky ortiz and hornswaggle are great and very talented

he isnt with the wwe because his wife got the cancer so he left

thats not a good excuse for leaving wwe, the good excuse is that he sucked and he is an untalented wrestler

Let me ask u seomthing. If your wife, or whatever u have got cancer, would u be able to travel around and not be with her?

Mar 15, 2009 -- 5:02AM, cena rules wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:57AM, Jericho-Holic wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:51AM, cena rules wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:47AM, Smoo wrote:

Cheap production value doesn't mean its a crappier company. Its the show that matters, not which building it is in or if it has a bigger crowd or not.

Its laughable to think that RVD is "talentless" and I'm sure many people would agree with me.The old ECW had good storylines and wrestling it was an alternative to WCW and WWE which is what made it popular, it had a variety of good quality wrestling, high flying wrestlers, and hardcore styled matches.

The new ECW has worse quality wrestling and storylines. Sure it has a better production value because its with the WWE, its not the "real" ECW because of that.

ECW was never good until wwe bought ecw, and RVD is talentless because if he was talented then why isnt he with wwe right now????
The old ecw had skinny anorexic wrestler who were spot monkey's just fly around the ring and that was not entertaining at all. But now ecw is good because guys like ricky ortiz and hornswaggle are great and very talented

You think a midget (know offence to midgets, there awesome) is better than RVD? I mean dont get me wrong hes better than Cena. But RVD isnt in WWE cause he dosent want to be.

Dude RVD sucks just like the old ecw, WWE would never hire those washed up ecw originals because wwe knows that they are untallented and useless

Hey dipsh*t, they hired most of them at one time. But they all retired and asked to be realeased. People like Sandman, Sabu, RVD, Stevie Richards, Balls Mahoney. O lets see who else who still is in WWE - Tommy Dreamer, Chris Jericho, Rey Mysterio

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:51AM, cena rules wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:47AM, Smoo wrote:

Cheap production value doesn't mean its a crappier company. Its the show that matters, not which building it is in or if it has a bigger crowd or not.

Its laughable to think that RVD is "talentless" and I'm sure many people would agree with me.The old ECW had good storylines and wrestling it was an alternative to WCW and WWE which is what made it popular, it had a variety of good quality wrestling, high flying wrestlers, and hardcore styled matches.

The new ECW has worse quality wrestling and storylines. Sure it has a better production value because its with the WWE, its not the "real" ECW because of that.

ECW was never good until wwe bought ecw, and RVD is talentless because if he was talented then why isnt he with wwe right now????
The old ecw had skinny anorexic wrestler who were spot monkey's just fly around the ring and that was not entertaining at all. But now ecw is good because guys like ricky ortiz and hornswaggle are great and very talented

RVD isn't in WWE anymore because his contract expired and he is doing other things, you can't expect ALL wrestlers to keep going on for long periods of time.

Not all of the ECW wrestlers are spot monkeys. The RVD vs Jerry Lyn matches are some of the best matches I've seen, but if you don't find that entertaining then its just your personal taste. But some of the points that you are saying are untrue and ignorant.

By the way, do you have any valid reasons why RVD "sucks''?

Mar 15, 2009 -- 5:04AM, cena rules wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 5:00AM, Jericho-Holic wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:58AM, cena rules wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:54AM, the noan wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:51AM, cena rules wrote:

Mar 15, 2009 -- 4:47AM, Smoo wrote:

Cheap production value doesn't mean its a crappier company. Its the show that matters, not which building it is in or if it has a bigger crowd or not.

Its laughable to think that RVD is "talentless" and I'm sure many people would agree with me.The old ECW had good storylines and wrestling it was an alternative to WCW and WWE which is what made it popular, it had a variety of good quality wrestling, high flying wrestlers, and hardcore styled matches.

The new ECW has worse quality wrestling and storylines. Sure it has a better production value because its with the WWE, its not the "real" ECW because of that.

ECW was never good until wwe bought ecw, and RVD is talentless because if he was talented then why isnt he with wwe right now????
The old ecw had skinny anorexic wrestler who were spot monkey's just fly around the ring and that was not entertaining at all. But now ecw is good because guys like ricky ortiz and hornswaggle are great and very talented

he isnt with the wwe because his wife got the cancer so he left

thats not a good excuse for leaving wwe, the good excuse is that he sucked and he is an untalented wrestler

Let me ask u seomthing. If your wife, or whatever u have got cancer, would u be able to travel around and not be with her?

Yep I would leave my wife in the hospital and move on and be with my career but he and wwe knows that he sucks and he would never fit into a wwe superstar, he just sucks

So can you tell me whats the standard template of a WWE superstar? Whats the absolute gimmick and wrestling style that fits?

There is none, RVD is unorthodox which makes him unique, and which makes him popular.

And honestly you must have very low morals if you would leave your wife to possibly die in hospital. When/if she does make it out, she wouldn't want to be with someone like that.