Post Reply
|
1 month ago ::
Oct 26, 2009 - 6:46AM
#51
|
|
|
Money, i don't think i could be able to manage TNA company in the correct way.
n_n
|
|
1 month ago ::
Oct 26, 2009 - 5:27PM
#52
|
|
|
Taking over any company would require a great amount of strategical and intelligent business decisions. I couldn't own up to that critical responsibility, but the business experience would be excellent.
All in all, I'd have to take that one million dollars, and submit a resume in for a creative poisition and try and butt heads with Russo a bit provided my acquisition. Think I'd like to help pitch some ideas instead of run the company.
[img]http://i37.tinypic.com/2eaiccm.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i38.tinypic.com/f22buc.jpg[/img]
The men that brought armageddon to their dreams and finally realized them to close the year of 2008!
|
|
1 month ago ::
Oct 27, 2009 - 1:12AM
#53
|
|
|
Taking over any company would require a great amount of strategical and intelligent business decisions. I couldn't own up to that critical responsibility, but the business experience would be excellent.
All in all, I'd have to take that one million dollars, and submit a resume in for a creative poisition and try and butt heads with Russo a bit provided my acquisition. Think I'd like to help pitch some ideas instead of run the company.
Personally,that isn't a bad idea:instead of running TNA,work for creative!!!
|
|
1 month ago ::
Oct 27, 2009 - 3:58AM
#54
|
|
|
I'd take the -million. Obviously, I'd rather be set for life than have to endure being the one responsible for TNA falling apart.
To you people who disagree, it takes more than an intelligent and well-informed opinion of wrestling to run a wrestling organization. It isn't as easy as sitting down in front of your xbox 360 and plotting a year's worth of storylines on the latest Smackdown vs Raw game. It takes a concerted effort of teamwork and cooperation, which is very difficult to induce given the "me first" philosophy shared by most talent and backstage hands alike. It's about knowing how to make the other wrestlers respect you so they don't make the promotion you run their little playground with their whiny demands. It's about keeping the wrestlers that matter happy and making the useless wrestlers into examples when necessary.
Most of all, it's about continually adapting to the simplistic whims of a whiny fan base, 90 percent of whom believe they could do a better job than you and .0001 percent of whom would actually be able to back up their claims.
So funny, but so true. Some people honestly think booking is just saying I HAVE AN IDEA and then running with it.
I would take the 1 million dollars.
Saying pro wrestling and MMA and boxing are all the same is a bit like saying ducks, swans and geese are all the same. Sure, they share some common DNA, but they're still clearly different.
|
|
1 month ago ::
Oct 28, 2009 - 1:48AM
#55
|
|
|
Here's another question:
Suppose you did decide to run TNA for a year:would you hire Hulk Hogan or let him compete?
Yes or No?
Why or Why Not???
|
|
1 month ago ::
Oct 28, 2009 - 4:31AM
#56
|
♥Chloe Brooke♥1/2 of Defining Beauty
|
Here's another question:
Suppose you did decide to run TNA for a year:would you hire Hulk Hogan or let him compete?
Yes or No?
Why or Why Not???
FVCK NO I wouldn't hire him! He's too old to wrestle and while we're on the subject I sure as heck wouldn't hire Eric ****off I mean Bischoff either TNA doesn't need him. They got a 1.1 Rating last week they're doing fine...somewhat they got an old dog in charge over there that's doing nothing to help TNA. She hired hulk hogan so apparently she's trying to murder TNA.
|
Post Reply
|
|
