i am curious to why new wrestlers are getting big pushes and major recognition by the WWE whle more established guys are being left behind. Vladimir Kozlov is about to recieve a WWE title shot and my question is why? what has he done in his short career to merit a title shot? maybe a small title to give him a push like the U.S. title but the WWE title? when i was growing up the WE title was reserved for the top guys and guys in there first few years didnt really get to much. Hell i can remember Stone Cold being around or almost 5 years or so before he was even given a shot at the WWE strap. HBK, same story. yet here we are and guys whos character hassnt even really been etablished yet are main eventing pay per views. i dont know about you but i dont tune in to see the rookies every week on raw and smackdown. i watch WWE programming for the guys that have been puting on a good show for me for years now and the rookies are the filler matches that i watch waiting to be impressed before the guys i want to see go on. the WWE needs to stop trying to push the new guys to the front and the pros to the back. im all for bringing in the new blood but the gotta prove they belong first
|
|
I agree with you ,the only problem is that we live in a "what have you done for me lately " world . therefore they have to push whoever they think is going to bring in the most viewers at that particular time ,no matter how long or how short they have been with the company. The one thing to keep in mind though is that the cream always rises to the top and at the end of the day the best wrestlers and performers will have the extended careers ! Keep watching I think the WWE is ready for a new golden age , and they are just trying to find the wrestlers that will be a part of it . I mean look at jeff hardy hes a young guy but I think he will be a part of this new Golden Age and the only way to find these hidden gems is to weed through the well..........WEEDS ! dutyfree |
|
|
I partly understand, but with someone like Kozlov, obviously being the next Brock Lesnar, they can't have him losing week in and week out then all of a sudden push him as this unbeatable superstar a year or two down the line - Snitsky will never get a big push because he was made to look weak practically from week one. He'll be one to be wished the "best of luck in his future endeavours" shortly. |
|
|
|


I've been wondering the exact same thing ever since Kenny Dykstra got his first WWE Title shot back in like what...2005 or 2006? The dude was 20 years old if I remember correctly and it had only been a few months since his debut with the Spirit Squad. I was outraged to say the least, lol. And now where is he? He's been released. Ugh....But yeah, I totally agree with your point. Gone are the days when the guys had to be with the company for several years before they even had a shot at the title. Several need to earn their keep first, as much as I love her to death, Mickie James winning the title after like 3 or 4 months was crazy. And against TRISH no less. And also as much as I admire him, CM Punk is another. I think he's great & I was happy for him big time, but these guys are really getting the title too early. And also Michelle McCool. I totally look up to her, and they could have definitely picked a worse diva to win it, but I felt that Victoria should have atleast had a SHOT at the Diva's Title. She's gone several years without a belt and she's like the only remaining original diva from when I started watching (back at the end of 2003). Wow, I must have been needing to let off some steam about that, lol. Great blog, & great points! =]
♫Stephanie♫01:17 AM EST