Is it just me or does this new Kane angle seem like it has something to do with Payl Bearer's death a few years ago at the Great American Bash?  Even Mr. Bearer wonders. http://percysposts.blogspot.com <-- paul bearer's blog.

Okay, first off i'd like to state that I am not sexist!  Yes, if you look at my friends.. almost all are female.  I request mostly females just because what guy wants a bunch of burly dudes all over his page?  It's no different than on any other social networking site!  Sadly, I accept almost every single request that comes my way.  I have only denied one and that was some weird stalker type sh!t begging me to get his internet girlfriend to speak to him.  I'm not trying to pull a Tila Tequila here and add millions to gain wealth and fame nor am I trying to seem like an ass to anyone.  If someone sends a request and seems like some sort of real person.. (fake pictures or not) I will 99% add them.  If anyone comments me or sends me a message I will respond no matter the sex, race, or sexual preference of that person.  I'm about to hit 200 friends and it is generally hard to find new people that either I have added or have added me.  Everytime I log on after a couple days I have atleast 10 friends requests and tons of messages!  I don't know if it's because of my blog posts or my looks (which i think is utter blasphemy as im as fugly as that oily dancer guy on RAW.)

So to recap here, I will comment/message/add anyone that seems human regardless of their gender or anything else.  I felt like this had to be said to prevent people from thinking i'm some freak on here trying to "hook-up" with thousands of people.. if you know what I mean.  =P

If you guys have any input about this, i'd love to hear it!

Hey guys!  I apologize for slacking lately on this site and leaving such "bland" comments to everyone.  I think the site is going to end up being great as the web developers add more content and features!  I've been overwhelmed with friend invites and messages lately so I definately apologize if I haven't gotten to/back to you yet as I haven't had much time to login and reply to all of you (although i've gotten some odd messages).

I should be able to get on here more starting this morning and i'd definately like to hear from all of you... especially on my user input blogs. =D

So I have a burning question for anyone who reads this!

How do you guys judge wrestlers?

Is it by their actual promotional talent on the mic?

Is it their actual talent inside the ring?

Do you base your opinion on their on-screen characters they've been assigned?

Is it a combination of all of these and even more?

Personally, I jude a wrestler on his or her talent as a wrestler first and then  their promotional mic skills.  I think just because the WWE has assigned a wrestler a terrible or "heel" type character, that shouldn't be used in judgement of their actual abilities.  So now that I have clarified that, an example would be Edge.  Sure, he's a heel character and is one of the most hated characters in WWE right now.  I believe the reason why he's so hated is because of how well he can shoot a promo on the mic and totally make fans feel like he's an evil guy.  That's total talent.  His in-ring work improves and is a lot better than most the "face" characters we see these days.  Edge has a huge future and I feel that people will adore him when he reaches that "face" character in the coming years.

Edge was just an example of my thoughts on the matter.  I could go on about Kennedy being a major star in the coming years, but I think you all get my point.

What are your thoughts?